by Thermo 3. October 2011 18:36

 Bursting a Bubble

Frankest of Frogs,

 

I need a written response to my inquiry.  I will use your response as a basis to NOT inject #2 copper cable that was installed prior to 1970.  My stance is that there has been an instance where this older cable has burst during injection due to loading and geometry changes and should be replaced. Your comments would help substantiate this claim.

 

Sincerely,

 

Albert A.

 

 

Figure 9.  Enlarged cross section of a cable, which burst at its tailored injection pressure (TIP). The cable was eccentric along a significant length. This photograph was taken 72 cm from the burst point. The minimum insulation thickness is less than the 4.19 mm minimum insulation thickness required by Table 4-7 of ICEA S-97-682-2004. Note that the strand-shield remains in intimate contact with the strands. 

 

 Dear Albert-

I’m not sure you will be able to use my comments to substantiate your claim. While you are exactly right that “… there has been an instance where this older cable burst during injection,” it is also true that about 9,999 cable segments of similar vintage have not burst during injection.  Put another way, bursting cable has historically occurred in just 0.01% of injection cases – success is realized 99.99% of the time! There aren’t many things with that level of performance.  And even for that single case, the burst occurred, because the cable was eccentric and did not meet the minimum insulation thickness requirements of Table 4-7 of ICEA S-97-682-2004 of 4.19 mm. This lonely case was described in some detail on Page 5 of ...

 

Silicone Injection: Better with Pressure

 

... presented in Subcommittee A of the Insulated Conductors Committee (ICC) on May 19, 2009. I have reproduced Figure 9 from that paper above.

 

Reliably yours (at least with four nines),

 

T. B. Frog

Tags: , ,

Operational Considerations

by Thermo 12. July 2011 20:49

 Splice Quandary

 Dear All-knowing Frog,

My firm’s cable system consists of cable segments with existing hand-taped splices and “Dutchmen” type splices.  Describe how your company would inject cables with both these types of splices and the benefits\cost savings.

Can you help me with my splice quandary?

Al Berta

Dear Al-

You came to the right Frog.  Many circuit owners reflexively think about replacing the entire cable run when a single blocked splice is encountered. Replacement of the entire run is the least capital efficient approach.  To understand why this is so, check out my August 31, 2010 post “Of Splices and Prices.”

Dealing directly with splices is definitely the way to go. Novinium is the only rehabilitation supplier that offers three solutions – a good solution, a better solution, and a best solution.

Good

Traditionally, when blocked splices (or splice pairs a.k.a Dutchmen) are encountered they are excavated and replaced.  They may be replaced with a molded repair splice, where the repair splice length is great enough to span the gap between the two cable ends, or a pair of regular length molded splices together with a length of stranded and non-strand-blocked cable. Hose clamps are included on the molded splices to provide added hoop strength and improve their pressure holding capability.

Pros

Cons

Off-the-shelf molded components.

Non-strand-blocked cable required for Dutchmen

Maximum pressure limitation is about 30 psig – only unsustained pressure rejuvenation (UPR) may be utilized

Splice must be molded EPDM rubber

Injection fluid comes in direct contact with splice body: (1) Fluid absorbed into splice body does not improve cable performance; (2) At temperatures above 55°C, the splice body may become distorted and fail; (3) There remains some risk of interfacial contamination from leaks, which may result in tracking and failure

Click here to learn more from “Improving Post-treatment Reliability: Eliminating Fluid-Component Compatibility Issues”

 

Better 

Using Novinium’s patented (U.S. Patents 7,615,247, 7,195,504, 7,538,274, 7,683,260, and their non-U.S. equivalents) sustained pressure rejuvenation (SPR) process, splices are replaced with almost any kind of splice and the cable is injected from the splice pit in both directions, back to the next cable end.

Pros

Cons

Off-the-shelf components of any material may be used

Must use SPR process, which means all other splices in the cable segment must be replaced, even if they support flow

SPR injection provides the longest reliable life

Fluid does not contact splice body

Any cable may be used for short segment between Dutchmen

Leak-proof, shrink-back-proof performance

  

Best

Combining the “pros” and eliminating all but one “con” of the good and better splice solutions is the Novinium flow-through splice. Shown in the drawing nearby a simple modification of a standard 3M compression connector makes for a flow-through splice without any pressure limitations. With the Novinium flow-through splice the cable can be treated with UPR or SPR methods and there is zero loss of fluid to the component.

Pros

Cons

Off-the-shelf molded or shrink-to-fit components of any material may be used

Non-strand-blocked cable required for Dutchmen.

Either SPR injection, which provides the longest reliable life, or UPR injection, which allows flow through some existing splices may be utilized

Fluid does not contact splice body

 

Benefits and Savings

Novinium is the only firm with all three of these tools in its toolbox.  I’m reminded of Maslow’s hammer, popularly phrased: “If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.”  If Novinium had only the “Good” approach, the circuit owner would have to accept the “Cons” associated with that approach. Instead, Novinium chooses the right tool for any circumstance – the tool that minimizes the time required to inject (i.e. saving money) and maximizes the post-injection reliability.

With options that can be tailored to your needs,

T. B. Frog

Tags: , , , , , ,

Operational Considerations

by Thermo 1. July 2011 21:13

Deep Creep

Dear Deep Diving Frog,

I was reading a paper on your web site “Silicone Injection: Better with Pressure” that was discussing fluid pressures that different cable insulations could withstand. The testing was done at Florida Power and Light and showed that XLPE cable could withstand up to 750 PSI before bulging and approximately 650 PSI before a point of inflection was reached where deflection accelerates with further pressure increases. The pressure was increased 50 PSI every 15 minutes. Have any sustained pressure tests been performed on XLPE cables under the pressures that will be used for submarine cables, since the pressure will be sustained for months?  Also, I assume that shore ends will be a bigger concern for pressure impacts than deep water sections where the weight of the water will be pushing back on the cable?

Regards,

Concerned about Creep

Dear Concerned-

Editors note:  I had to fight my froggy urge to respond "Dear Creep."

Nearby, I have reproduced Figure 5 from the “Better with Pressure” paper, to which you refer, except I embellished it with my lovely image.  I would encourage my other readers to immerse themselves in the entirety of that paper.  First, I must make an important correction to your question.  The insulation of the cable in Figure 5 was uncrosslinked HMWPE or high molecular weight polyethylene.  Cross-linked polyethylene or XLPE has significantly better mechanical properties.  In fact, similar sized XLPE cables were injected “on-the-reel” by Hendrix Wire & Cable in the late 1980’s at pressure of 750 to 1000 psig.  See Table 1, the accompanying text on page 2, and references [5] and [6] of the “Better with Pressure” paper.

The inflection point at 650 psig is labeled as such in the figure. Up to 650 psig the difference in the inside pressure and outside pressure increased the diameter less than about 1.5% – this is less than the diametrical deflection caused by a temperature cycle to the cable’s design temperature.  However, once this inflection point is reached, polymer bonds are actually broken and the diameter change is not entirely reversible. That is, the diameter does not return to its original value when the pressure is removed. Of course, this frog would never get close to the inflection point … we stay below this point by a factor of at least three!

We have not done laboratory experiments with multi-month injection periods, but we have something even better – multi-month operational experience.  At a meeting of the Insulated Conductors Committee (ICC) on May 19, 2009, my colleague, Glen Bertini, made a presentation titled “Lessons in Submarine Cable Rejuvenation” in the C11 discussion group.  Slide 14 of that presentation describes an injection of a 14,432 foot, 1/0 compact, 25kV XLPE cable crossing Desolation Sound in beautiful British Columbia.  Desolation Sound is about 1,500 feet deep at that location.  The fluid took about 100 days, or over three months, just to reach the other end. The injection pressure was about 300 pisg. Several years later the cable remains in operation.

Polymer creep is the slow plastic flow suffered by polymers when a force is applied to them over a long time period.  Cross-linked polymers do not suffer the same level of creep as their uncrosslinked cousins unless the polymer bonds are actually broken by exceeding the yield strength of the material.  The concern you express should definitely be considered for HMWPE insulated cables.
 
To the extent that there is any creep at all, you are correct the greatest pressure differential (ΔP) is at the feed end of the cable.  At the other shore end or outlet end, the ΔP is zero.  If the cable had no elevation changes, the ΔP would decline in a straight line from the feed pressure on the feed end, to zero at the outlet end.  Of course, as you recognize, there are elevation changes inherent in all submarine cable installations.  The water on the outside of the cable does reduce the ΔP in the submerged portion of the cable, but not exactly as you imagined.  You see gravity pulls upon the fluid too, so the absolute pressure inside the cable goes up as cable plunges into the abyss.  Water, in general, and seawater in particular, are denser than the injection fluid so the external pressure increases faster with depth than the internal pressure.  If there were going to be an issue it would occur on the shore, right at the feed point.  The photograph nearby is the termination at Desolation Sound … still providing reliable service today.

Willing to dive deep, but never creepy,

Thermonuclear

Tags: ,

Operational Considerations | Rejuvenation Science

by Thermo 21. April 2011 16:01
Middle East Query – 22 Questions
Dearest wet one,
 
Frogs are few and far between,
The Arabian Peninsula is where I am at,
Allow me to set the scene,
Sand spread on the flat.
 
Even though our climate is dry,
And oil production is what I do,
It’s true our cables often fry,
May I inquire twenty-two?
 
Inquiry
Answer
1.     What kinds, types, and sizes of power cables can be injected?
2.     What kinds, types, and sizes of power cables cannot be injected?
3.     How old is cable injection technology?
4.     How much time does it take to inject a certain length of cable?  What is the maximum cable length that can be injected?
5.     How much time does it take to locate splices? Who will identify the splices? Is it the contractor or the customer?
6.     Does the injection apply only at utilities or at industrial plants too?
7.     Does Novinium have proof of success available (references)?
8.     How do you rejoin cable ends after an old splice is removed?
9.     Will the injection affect the semicon around the conductor since the fluid will penetrate through it?
10.   Can injection be carried out twice on the same cable after 10-20 years of the first injection?
11.   How many years will the curing extend the life of the cable?
12.   What is the expected cost of curing compared to cable replacement?
13.   Can the customer test the cable right after injection? Could it be done immediately? If not, after how many days, weeks or months?
14.   Does Novinium have any available research papers or studies?  Does Novinium have IEEE articles?
15.   Does Novinium have any type/kind of certification?
16.   What if my cable strands have water block design elements?
17.   Does injection have any impact on cable ampacity?
18.   If a cable were to fail after injection, can the customer use ordinary splices? Or should he use the “Novinium” specified splice? Can we use the traditional splices and terminations if a fault took place after treatment? In other words, do we have to use your splices and terminations on any treated cable all the time or that is only during treatments?
19.   Do the existing cable terminations need to be replaced? Will this introduce new splices?
20.   Are your splices and terminations available in the market or it is unique to Novinium?
21.   If we have to use your splices and termination all the time, do we need special training for our technicians and if yeas can provide such training and how much is cost?
22.   Did you type test your splices and terminations and are they certified to be used in such applications?
 
Hal beemkanek mosa’adati? [Editor:  هل بإمكانك مساعدتي؟/Can you help me?]
Dweller of the Desert
 
Salam Dweller of the Desert-
 
I have visited your beautiful country.  I snapped the photo nearby of your lovely red sand dunes as I drove from Riyhad to Al Khobar.  Mind you, I do not wander through the desert, as the dry sand irritates my lovely and moist skin.  Twenty-two questions is too many to deal with in a single post, so I will batch the questions and answers into a series of posts.  Links will appear in the table nearby as those posts become available.
 
For now, Ma’a salama (مع السلامة/Good bye)
T. B. Frog
by Thermo 3. August 2010 23:13

Better with Presure

Dear Frog of Knowledge,

How can we be sure that the higher pressure does not damage the polymer insulation or impact the contact between the semiconducting conductor shield and the conductor?  Also, does the expansion affect the interface adhesion between the insulation and the insulation shield, especially for older cables with thermoplastic EIS?

Regards,

SFZ

Better with PressureDear SFZ-

First of all, Novinium is the only company in the world that can use all of the available injection paradigms.  The state-of-the-art in rejuvenation technology is sustained pressure rejuvenation or SPR.  The folks at Novinium invented that technology.  The old method is called unsustained pressure rejuvenation or UPR and Novinium founders invented that approach too.  To learn more about the differences between SPR and UPR check out my blog entry, “How to inject cables” at …

http://www.novinium.com/frogblog/post/2010/06/18/How-To-Inject-Cables.aspx

To get a direct and comprehensive answer to your question read the paper, “Silicone Injection:  Better with Pressure” at …

 http://www.novinium.com/pdf/papers/Better_With_Pressure.pdf

I have reproduced the summary of that paper below …

“Rejuvenation injection pressures up to 1000 psig have been in use for over two decades.

Thousands of cables have been treated with moderate pressures in the 100 psig to 400 psig range. Every time moderate pressure injection has been examined against a lower pressure control, the higher pressure injection has outperformed the lower pressure control.

Cables are designed to accommodate the radial stresses that occur throughout their service. A cable warms with increasing load and cools when the load decreases. The 5.8-times and 6.8-times differences between the linear expansion with temperature of conductors and their insulating polymers create transient gaps between the conductor and the conductor shield.  These transient gaps are a normal part of daily operation and deflections of 1% of the cable radius are common. The very similar deflection experienced when a cable is injected a single time creates no forces that are materially different and induces no geometrical deflections that are greater than a single temperature escalation from ambient to a cable’s maximum operating temperature. In contrast to the daily temperature cycles endured by a cable, sustained pressure rejuvenation involves a single cycle. Because sustained pressure rejuvenation utilizes an injection adaptor with shrinkback restraint, the only possible manifestation of the single pressure cycle or future daily temperature cycles is entirely eliminated. Experiments confirm that there are no significant changes in the geometry of a cable treated with the SPR process. Field observations such as that memorialized in Figure 8 (of the paper) confirm the laboratory measurements.

Not only does moderate pressure injection provide higher performance (even with older technology fluids), but it also lowers the cost of injection and makes possible the use of advanced rejuvenation materials. Few circuit owners would consider buying a cable today, which did not have anti-oxidant or tree-retardant properties. The newest generation of rejuvenation fluids has about two to three times the viscosity of the first generation fluid, because these fluids include advanced functionalities that provide 2 to 4 times more post-injection life than the lower viscosity 22-year old technology.

Sustained pressure rejuvenation (SPR), thermally enhanced rejuvenation (TER), and Unsustained Pressure Rejuvenation (UPR) are tools that circuit owners should have available for their rehabilitation programs. No one tool works best in every circumstance.”

Rejecting the one-size-fits-all mentality,

Thermonuclear

Tags:

Operational Considerations | Rejuvenation Science

Frog Blog

Month List